COMPILED
BY TASK GROUP MEMBERS:
Schalk van Wyk (Sasol
Mining)
Fats Dreyer (Sasol Mining)
Riaan van Rooyen (Sasol Mining)
Piet Smit (Sasol Mining)
Rodger Patterson (Anglocoal)
Rudolf Peens (Anglocoal)
Edward Hagemeier (Anglocoal)
Mark Fanoe (Anglocoal)
Chris Knoetze (Ingwe)
Peter Doidge (Ingwe)
21 April 2003
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
Increasingly, managers and engineers are expected to
demonstrate how existing and foreseeable risks have been addressed, including
the actions required to reduce the risks to tolerable levels.
The employer’s responsibility is not only to
employees but also to any person who could be exposed to a hazard arising
from the mining operation or related process as stated in Section 5 (2)(b),
which requires that:
“as far as reasonably practicable, every employer
must -
(a) identify the relevant hazards and assess the related
risks to which persons who are not employees may be exposed; and
(b) ensure that persons who are not employees, but
who may be directly affected by the activities at the mine, are not exposed
to any hazards to their health and safety”.
Therefore, the responsibility placed on employers,
regarding hazard identification and risk assessment, look both inwards
at the workplace and outwards at persons who are not part of the mining
activities, as regard their health and safety.
Due to the above responsibility imposed on the employer,
SACEA were requested to do an investigation into the coal mining related
rigging accidents with the objective to review training needs as well
as draughting a guideline which could be employed in an attempt to reduce
the rigging related accidents and incidents.
ACCIDENT STATISTICS
For the investigation, accident statistics regarding
lifting equipment and machinery since 1995 were drawn from the DME. This
information is represented in the bar graphs below (Figures 1 to 4).
From the bar graphs it is evident that too many accidents
occur in the mining industry regarding the use of lifting equipment and
machinery, and the trend is not encouraging either. These statistics
exclude any minor injuries and incidents occurring at the individual
mines. Keeping in mind the incident triangle of Frank Bird, for the 22
fatals, which occurred since 1995, at least 13,200 lifting equipment
related incidents (i.e. 22 x 600) must have occurred. Frightening statistics!
The DRM for lifting equipment has only completed phase
5 of the 7 phases of the approval process and it will still be a few
months before the guideline for a COP on lifting equipment is issued
by the DME.
Figure 1: Annual lifting equipment accidents
for the coal mining industry.

Figure 2: Lifting equipment accidents by type
of equipment for the coal mining industry.
Figure 3: Annual lifting equipment accidents
for the total mining industry.
Figure 4: Lifting equipment accidents by type
of equipment for the total mining industry.
GUIDELINES
1. OBJECTIVE
The following objective for the task group putting this set
of guidelines together was formulated as follows:
“To establish a set of guidelines
which will ensure safe working practices regarding rigging practices.”
2. DEFINITION
Initially the term “lifting” was referred to, but
it was decided to rather use the term “rigging” which is
also inclusive of moving equipment in any direction, i.e. vertically,
horizontally and at any other angle. Rigging was then defined as:
“The altering of a load’s position
in any direction by applying a force with the aid of a lifting machine,
lifting tackle and/or ancillary equipment.”
3. FRAMEWORK
The following framework is the basis of the guideline
document.
3.1 Workmen permitted to do rigging tasks
3.1.1 Competency – (The legal definition
is used)
- Certification which includes a theoretical and
practical test on the use, inspection and the maintenance of rigging
equipment (MQA unit standards to apply – not just maintenance
personnel, and should be included at the lowest level (No limit in
weight - heavy weights & difficult loads to be classified as critical
tasks with the relevant risks identified and SOPs draughted to address
risks)).
- Theoretical test to be based on an accredited training program.
- Practical tests to be based on prescribed outcomes (to be relevant
to either maintenance or operational personnel) as determined by the
initial risk assessments.
- Retesting of competent persons to be done as and when required.
- Hazard identification by line supervision regarding rigging activities
and equipment.
- Relevant training and certification to be given to maintenance and
operational personnel applicable to tasks to be performed.
3.1.2 Appointments and authorisations
- Responsible supervisor’s (maintenance and operational) to
be appointed by the manager. The appointment to include the scope of
responsibility.
- Only persons found to be competent may be appointed.
- These appointments to emphasize their responsibility for maintaining
rigging equipment logbooks.
- All competent persons to perform rigging tasks should be authorized
to do so in writing.
3.1.3 Training administration (Control & issuing)
- Proper training registers to be kept and updated
on a regular basis including feedback to 1st line supervision.
- All persons responsible for people performing rigging tasks should
be trained in the hazard identification associated with those tasks.
3.2 Rigging equipment requirements.
3.2.1 Determine all rigging tasks performed at a
specific site.
3.2.2 Rigging equipment requirements to be determined
according to risk assessments.
3.2.3 Properly specified, certified, conspicuously
and indelibly marked and registered (logbook) equipment to be used
for the relevant tasks.
3.3 Planning and preparation prior to performing
rigging tasks
3.3.1 Do task specific risk assessments for any planned
or breakdown activity. With reference to existing SOP’s and COP’s
if any changes to the tasks, resources or the environment occur.
3.3.2 When simultaneous tasks are undertaken on the
same system/equipment, cognisance should be taken of the interaction
between the tasks which may lead to hazardous situations or conditions.
3.3.3 The roles and responsibilities of team members
and the means of communication should be clarified prior to the execution
of a rigging task.
3.3.4 Identify the task, the scope of work to be
performed, competencies of personnel and rigging equipment to be used.
3.3.5 Implement controls to eliminate or minimize
hazards/impacts identified in the risk assessment process.
3.3.6 Task observations should be performed to monitor
compliance and adequacy of the existing SOP and to further improve
on the existing SOP.
3.4 Personal safety and protective equipment.
3.4.1 PPE to be used in accordance with the relevant
task’s risk assessment and the OEM’s specifications and
requirements.
3.4.2 Personal safety and protective equipment to
be inspected prior to use to ensure compliance with the applicable
standards.
3.4.3 Ensure that personnel understand the limitations
of the personal safety and protective equipment.
3.5 Inspection, maintenance and care of equipment.
Refer to legal and OEM requirements pertaining to
the inspection, storage, safe operation, maintenance and care of the
relevant rigging equipment for specific applications. If such requirements
are not available or specified, the end-user must draught standards
to address the above requirements.
In addition, the following criteria should be considered
in the draughting of a standard:
Inspections - Frequencies?
- Pre and post task inspections
- What to inspect?
- Who should inspect?
- How to inspect?
Maintenance - Describe maintenance tasks
and frequencies for each type of rigging equipment
Safe operation - “Do’s & Don’ts”
- Warnings!
- Actions when faulty equipment is discovered
Storage, handling & transporting requirements
3.6 Examination of rigging equipment.
3.6.1 Prior to use
The competent person to ensure that rigging equipment
planned to be used for a specific task is the correct type of equipment
and also in a safe working condition.
3.6.2 During use
Competent person to be continuously aware of the
condition of the rigging equipment in use during performing of a task.
Damaged or failed equipment should be reported and replaced immediately
and removed from the site.
3.6.3 After use
Competent person to do a thorough final inspection
of all rigging equipment used and report any defects detected. Prior
to storage, all rigging equipment should be cleaned and maintained
to standard.
Any defects detected should be recorded in the relevant
logbook.
3.6.4 Registers
All rigging equipment to be uniquely identified
and recorded in a register. Registers to be kept and updated by the
relevant appointed person and over-inspected at regular intervals.
3.7 Testing and certification of rigging equipment.
3.7.1 All rigging equipment should be tested and
certified in accordance with OEM standards and relevant legislation.
TRAINING
A vast variety of training courses throughout the mining
industry is employed which range from basic on-the-job rigging training
for artisans to full rigger artisan training, which includes a full apprenticeship
for 18 months to 2 years. A very important point to take note of is that
most apprenticeships include a basic rigging course, but on its own as
a once-off course is not enough to last the artisan throughout his/her
entire career, i.e. refresher training on a regular basis is crucial.
What confuses the whole training issue is that “rumours” run
around in industry that artisans, other than riggers, may only be trained
to lift loads up to 2,000 kg. This issue was discussed with a Snr. Inspector
of machinery at the DME, who confirmed this to be untrue. He also confirmed
that once a thorough risk assessment was completed on the lifting of
a critical load and an SOP written on how to complete such a lift safely,
artisans can be trained to perform these tasks without the help of a
qualified rigger.
Through further research on the internet, the website http://www.tssonline.net/cgi-bin/Prodsel.pl?cat=Industrial%20Safety revealed
real wordclass safety training aids for rigging and lifting practices.
It is worth the while to visit this web-site and to browse through the
wide range of safety training products and services.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion then it is evident from the accident statistics
represented by figures 1 to 4, that we as managers and engineers have
a great challange to drastically reduce the rigging and lifting related
accidents and to ensure that all our artisans and foremen are well trained
in the basics of rigging and lifting practices.
Basic rigging courses available from the various mining
houses, as well as the artisan’s training syllabus regarding basic
rigging and lifting training requirements as per the MQA unit standards,
were used to ensure relevance and comprehensiveness of this rigging guideline.
The guidelines for the draughting of a COP for lifting
equipment from the DME were used to ensure comprehensiveness of this
rigging guideline.
RECOMMENDATION
From the above information the following recommendations are made:
1. Mining houses to use this set of rigging guidelines
to draught a COP for basic rigging.
2. Hand over this set of rigging guidelines to the
MQA for inclusion in the unit stards.
3. Seriously consider utilising the safety training aids available
from Technical Standards Services Ltd’s website:
http://www.tssonline.net/cgi-bin/Prodsel.pl?cat=Industrial%20Safety.
If one product has to be singled out, it would be the pocket
size booklet “The International Rigging and Lifting
Handbook”. This is a comprehensive booklet based on
good practice emphasising legislative requirements, definitions,
principles, user examination, proper selection of equipment
and a safe approach to lifting. It meets the requirements
for the provision of written instructions, and is also regarded
as an industry standard handbook used extensively in the
oil and gas and construction industries.
This handbook could be issued to each artisan and
forman once they are trained in the basics of rigging and lifting practices.
4. Continue doing risk assessments on critical rigging
tasks, write SOPs for these tasks, train all relevant artisans on the
SOPs and do planned task observations on them ensuring adherence to
safe rigging and lifting practices.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgement is hereby given to management of Sasol
Mining, Anglo Coal and Ingwe for allowing their members of the special
task group to spend time on the setting of this set of basic rigging
guidelines.
Acknowledgement is also given to members of the
DME and SACEA for their guidance in putting this document together.
|